home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / lang / c++-part2 / 15329 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1996-08-05  |  1.1 KB  |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.os.msdos.programer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
  2. Path: undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca!sckettle
  3. From: sckettle@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (Steve Kettle)
  4. Subject: Re: fastest code
  5. Sender: news@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (news spool owner)
  6. Message-ID: <DpCw9F.Lx@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
  7. Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 21:12:51 GMT
  8. References: <316112A2.7D37@public.sta.net.cn> <NFS9dJAHgWYxEwdO@chrism.demon.co.uk>
  9. Nntp-Posting-Host: noether.math.uwaterloo.ca
  10. Organization: University of Waterloo
  11.  
  12. In article <NFS9dJAHgWYxEwdO@chrism.demon.co.uk>,
  13. Chris Marriott  <chris@chrism.demon.co.uk> wrote:
  14. >In article <316112A2.7D37@public.sta.net.cn>, Xu Yifeng
  15. ><jafd@public.sta.net.cn> writes
  16. >>I'd like to know which C/C++ compiler generate fastest code?
  17. >>Borland, Microsoft, Watcom, High or Symantec?
  18. >
  19. >I've heard it said that Watcom have the best compiler in terms of code
  20. >speed. What they do NOT have is a particularly good development
  21. >environment - VC++ is the clear winner in that department.
  22. >
  23.  
  24. No way I think emacs c++-mode combined with makfiles and g++ rules. 
  25.  
  26. -- 
  27.